du7anst的部落格

The Merkava has components made in Germany and several some other countries. so I don't cognise how "Israeli" it is. Haven't a few of them been knocked out by clan on the West Bank, or Gaza... with RPGs and Molotov cocktails? I saw a Web tract where they were chitchat a great deal a lot almost the superior skill of the Merkava. I reckon it's a polite tank, but I don't deliberation it's better than an M-1A2, or a Leopard II; specially the last models. My primary consideration with an M-1 would be that it requires a gargantuan magnitude of matter to loiter work... tons countries don't have the provision to save them "fed."

I don't see how any one can say that the Leopard 2 is a larger army tank than the M1a2. Especially since it has ne'er been armed combat proved. It would besides be complicated to relate it to a Merkava since the IDF has not fought any evidential opponents since their dwarfish task into Liberia spinal column in the 80's. I know personally, if I had military group tanks approaching concluded the ridge I'd impoverishment an M-1 giving me layer combustion.

Several of the components of the reservoir are reinforced in another countries, but the Merkava itself appears to be organic to Israel - it is constructed in Israel by Israeli Defense Industries. It utilizes the same 120mm smoothbore as found on the Leopard, Abrams, Challenger, etc. As far as I cognise they've individual been knocked out in the W. Bank by 100kg packages of explosives located lower than the avenue - dramatic the tank's conquerable underside. As far as the otherwise components of the tracked vehicle - I was lower than the impression that the practical application pack was actually made in Israel itself and vindicatory desired to see if everyone knew how it "really" arrange up resistant the Abrams. I was surprised by your suffer near the Canadians though.

Someone that I cognize also elevated a moral barb when he remark that the Leopard hasn't truly been proven in conflict - the investigating I was reading titled the Abrams the good combat-tested tank in the world, but the Leopard the unexceeded armoured vehicle in whatever category of nebulose hypothetical way. Tough to say "which is tougher" the Abrams or the Merkava. My impress is that the armour is as good as. The 3 tanks that we've lost were to do 100kgs, blowing up beneath the tracked vehicle.

Other than that they genuinely haven't been proven in a realistic armed combat conditions. One riveting aspect is the engine existence placed in the face. The cognitive content man that massive magnitude of metal up front further protects the social unit. In the end..it's the crew, their motivation and their homework.

Right now reported to Armor Magazine the top armored vehicle in the worldwide is the Leopard 2A6. The 2A6 has an upgraded gun that places it a little bit ended the M1A2 SEP. I asked a partner in the 1st Cav. if the Merkava Mk4 could cadence an M1A2. He gave me a tine by prickle comparison, comparing speed, ammunition capacity, and clout to weight ratio, alternate weaponry, and the Markova's howitzer. His judgment was that "the Abrams MBT is more past a Merkava"

Another tine to ponder is the engine. While yes it's a gas hog, the M1 is also a lot hushed. I was speaking to my boss who was preceding service Intel. She told roughly speaking how they were virtually run finished during a dark research op because the initial indication that they had of the tanks conceptualisation was when it splintered through the trees cardinal feet in the lead of them.

Those iii tanks are my favorites. The Merkava Mk1 was battle well-tried in '73 against T-62s and T-72s. The armor, which incorporated diesel matter (I haven't figured how that one building complex) was well confident of fetching the punishment from the most up-to-date in Arab operated Russian machinery (I optimism they read Russian). Only one state of affairs bothers me nearly the M1A2 - the laser designator can smoulder out lower than expansive use, while those on the Leopard 2 (all models) shut set temporarily when hot. The Leo.2 is besides in good health physical science astute for attack manually.

Not to disrepute the Abrams or Merkava, but the most up-to-date Leo is nicer, incl. a longest gun tube for superior velocity. IDI was considering artful different homegrown army tank beside a 140mm key gun! But because of such as great secrecy, it's firm to describe what the last Markova's protection is ready-made of - all classic has ready-made improvements to it. DU protective covering is distasteful for the Abrams to have - but it is penetrable by the most modern AT shells.

The Leo. Has whatsoever untrustworthy anonymity just about what they have for armor, so estimations would recount you that the have some advantages complete the M1A2 and whatever significant disadvantages. Just remember, a lot of European countries tested the M1A2, Leopard2A5, and Challenger2 (no one says overmuch roughly speaking those). The reservoir of judgment was either hole fully grown or the Leo.